Российский "Первый канал" уличили во лжи про ситуацию в Карабахе ( video )


https://www.rbc.ua/styler/zhizn/pervyy- ... 72201.html

А что они когда-то не врали? Одних событий по Украине достаточно

Пошла снегиря съем

А что они когда-то не врали? Одних событий по Украине достаточно

Пошла снегиря съем

Не забудь рабов покормить.

Is Erdogan playing Baku off against Moscow?
Following the latest outbreak of violence in Nagorno-Karabakh, Russian defense and foreign affairs ministers telephoned their counterparts in Armenia and Azerbaijan to urge the cessation of hostilities. Russian President Vladimir Putin appealed to both conflicting parties to be reasonable and insisted on an "immediate ceasefire."
In contrast, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan phoned only his Azerbaijani counterpart, Ilham Aliyev, to express his condolences over the death of Azerbaijani soldiers, thus taking sides, which was foreseeable.
Against the dire state of relations between Turkey and Russia, with Erdogan basically being ostracized by the Kremlin, the reignited conflict over the disputed Caucasus enclave gives Moscow yet another headache and could well count as a point scored in the psychological warfare between the two states.
Ankara has nothing to lose but stands to gain should Moscow become entangled in complicated diplomatic manoeuvres in order to pacify both Armenia, its staunchest and most formal ally in the region, and Azerbaijan, which continues to maintain a privileged relationship with Russia.
Moreover, should Moscow make a faux pas, abandon its balanced approach to the warring parties and show favoritism to Armenia, it would most certainly alienate Azerbaijan, to the joy of the present Turkish leadership.
Damaging in some way or another the relations between Baku and Moscow seems to be one of the motives of encouragement provided by Turkey to Azerbaijan at a moment when the UN, the OSCE, and major world powers are calling for restraint.
Adding fuel to the fire
Trying to identify the main culprit in the re-eruption of violence in Nagorno-Karabakh, that is, who fired the first shot, could well be futile. However, the opinion of Thomas de Waal of Carnegie Europe should be duly noted.
"It is more likely that one of the two parties to the conflict - and more likely the Azerbaijani side, which has a stronger interest in the resumption of hostilities - is trying to alter the situation in its favor with a limited military campaign," De Waal wrote in a blog posting.
"The dangerous aspect to this is that, once begun, any military operations in this conflict zone can easily escalate and get out of control," he stressed.
A serious danger may lie in the provisions of the 2011 Agreement on Strategic Partnership and Mutual Support between Turkey and Azerbaijan. The parties pledged to render support to each other using "all possible means" in the event of an attack or aggression against one of them. Getting involved in yet another conflict would buy additional time for President Erdogan as it allows him to further stoke ultra-nationalist feeling at home.
No less worrisome is that the conflict is acquiring religious connotations. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), has condemned "the attack by Armenian forces on the borders of occupied Azerbaijani territories" and Yerevan's "disrespect of the (unilateral) ceasefire" announced by Baku. Azerbaijan is a member of the OIC, and is receiving support specifically as an Islamic nation.
However, the international, both regional and global, context makes the conflict around Nagorno-Karabakh not just a risky adventure but a geopolitical mistake for the warring parties.
Reignited conflict in a region plagued by an intensified yet inconclusive war against the jihadists of ISIS comes at the most inopportune moment. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has urged the archenemies to return to peace talks under the auspices of the OSCE, and has reiterated that there is "no military solution to the conflict."
Actually, this is the crucial riddle. Why? Neither side is naiuml;ve or reckless enough to believe that the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute has a military solution. Why would Azerbaijan and Armenia take up arms? For them it is a lose-lose situation. Just as it is for Russia, which is unhappy with the continuous animosity and squabbling in its soft underbelly

Svetlaya, спасибо, я читала и биографию, и книги, включая Каменные сны. И непонятно, причем тут сошедший лоск. Я вижу, с аналогиями и параллелями Вы не очень друjите, особенно когда они не в Вашу пользу.

И как там с переговорами в свете расстрела парламента?

Эльза, мне как-то все равно, понимаю, "кругом враги, кругом стреляют", "шпионы за каждым углом". Одно неясно - я-то хоть про свою страну пишу, а вам сотоварищи какой, извините, гешефт от тысяч ругательных постов про Украину?

А вы тогда не ходите сами никуда и сидите здесь. Вы будете указывать, где и кому писать? )

Мы тут и в теме про Сирию знаете не сирийцы, а пишем. И в теме про Европу пишем.

Глупейший вопрос