Денизка, да читаешь ты меня от корки до корки , каждое моё слово и выпрыгиваешь из

штанов от злости.

Если вы так эмоциональны и не можете воспринимать новости адекватно, что делаете в политической?

Причем здесь Украина и Лесин, за которым следило ФБР и искало доказательства об отмывании денег, на уровне правительства РФ, когда подобрались близко, как вы думаете, кому было нужно, чтобы он не смог давать показания в суде в американском, как выводят деньги из бюджета РФ и отмывают их? Канечно не путэн Это Правый сектор или Порошенко!

И это чистая правда.

Obama: ‘Putin is Not Completely Stupid’



Vladimir Putin wants to be seen as the peer of U.S. leaders and remains businesslike during top-level meetings, U.S. President Barack Obama said in an interview published in the April issue of U.S. magazine The Atlantic.

Despite the Kremlin's official rhetoric, Obama said Putin “understands that Russia’s overall position in the world is significantly diminished. And the fact that he invades Crimea or is trying to prop up [Syrian President Bashar] Assad doesn’t suddenly make him a player. You don’t see [Putin] in any of these meetings out here helping to shape the agenda. For that matter, there’s not a G20 meeting where the Russians set the agenda around any of the issues that are important,” Obama was quoted as saying by The Atlantic.

“He’s constantly interested in being seen as our peer and as working with us, because he’s not completely stupid,” Obama said.

After the annexation of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, Kremlin officials, state television networks and loyalists cheered the move as a sign of Russia's might. But the impact of continuing Western sanctions on the Russian economy and living standards has caused domestic enthusiasm for the annexation to fade.

Russian air strikes in Syria, which began on Sept. 30, 2015, were lauded in Moscow as playing a leading role in the global fight against terrorism. But Western officials and analysts have accused Moscow of targeting Assad's political opponents to bolster the regime.

Since the annexation, Moscow officials and media have unleashed increasingly anti-Western and anti-U.S. rhetoric – some of it aimed personally against Obama – for domestic consumption. But Obama told The Atlantic that Putin makes an effort to be courteous in meetings with the U.S. president.

“The truth is, actually, Putin, in all of our meetings, is scrupulously polite, very frank,” Obama was quoted as saying. “Our meetings are very businesslike. He never keeps me waiting two hours like he does a bunch of these other folks.”

Putin has reportedly been late for meetings with Queen Elizabeth II, Pope Francis, senior U.S. and European officials, and kept former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych waiting for four hours.

Yanukovych, a Moscow-backed president, was ousted from power by large-scale protests two years ago – an uprising prompted by Yanukovych's decision, under Russian pressure, to back out of a plan for closer European integration. Russian officials claimed that the crisis and protests were orchestrated by the United States.

But while Ukraine may have been a major factor in Moscow's policies, it was much less so in Washington's, Obama told The Atlantic.

“The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-NATO country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do,” Obama was quoted as saying.

“Putin acted in Ukraine in response to a client state that was about to slip out of his grasp. And he improvised in a way to hang on to his control there,” he said. “He’s done the exact same thing in Syria, at enormous cost to the well-being of his own country.”

“Real power means you can get what you want without having to exert violence. Russia was much more powerful when Ukraine looked like an independent country but was a kleptocracy that he could pull the strings on,” Obama told The Atlantic.

Господи бедная женщина, с дефицитом внимания....что шедеврального ты светлая пишешь, чтобы тебя читать? Не тешь себя иллюзиями, мне действительно видно тебя только в цитатах. Ты хоть сама осознаешь, что бредятину одну и ту же пишешь? Я тебя в бан поставила только потому, что устала пролистывать твой пустой звон. Выпей успокающего чтоли - ни я, ни Глеб, ни Пектораль, ни Севендейз, ни Анна, не устроят майдан.Узбагойся

Еще кстати сказать- Стелла ни разу не шарит в английском, а иначе она бы уже распространённо комментировала Обамку

Еще кстати сказать- Стелла ни разу не шарит в английском, а иначе она бы уже распространённо комментировала Обамку

А в чём она особо шарит ....

Ну так вот же.
Хусейнович харрасит Путина- Стелла даже не реагирует.

Еще кстати сказать- Стелла ни разу не шарит в английском, а иначе она бы уже распространённо комментировала Обамку

Oath

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

Note: In certain circumstances there can be a modification or waiver of the Oath of Allegiance. Read Chapter 5 of A Guide to Naturalization for more information.

The principles embodied in the Oath are codified in Section 337(a) in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which provides that all applicants shall take an oath that incorporates the substance of the following:

Support the Constitution;
Renounce and abjure absolutely and entirely all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which the applicant was before a subject or citizen;
Support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
Bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
A. Bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; or
B. Perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; or
C. Perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law.

В точку. С дедками у нас тут как-то особенно не задалось

Вы же позволяете себе отпускать комменты, не относящиеся к теме, и высказывать своё мнение об уровне оппонентов. Почему оппонентам нельзя?